← Counting Dogs & Tails · all breeds · charts · compare
Bouvier des Flandres
origin: Belgium · 8 figures in the corpus · Q37896
Every figure below carries this breed's name or id in its source study -- grouped by what it measures, not ranked. A breed appearing under a study here does not mean every other breed was tested and came back negative; it means this is what has a named source so far. See each figure's own page for its caveats.
Size & head shape
Bouvier des Flandres: body size class -- Large
- Body size and cephalic index classification per Supplementary Table S5; for breeds absent from the study's primary source lists, assigned by majority agreement among Dogs Trust canine-behaviour experts rather than measured directly on dogs.
Bouvier des Flandres: head-shape (cephalic index) classification -- Mesocephalic
- Body size and cephalic index classification per Supplementary Table S5; for breeds absent from the study's primary source lists, assigned by majority agreement among Dogs Trust canine-behaviour experts rather than measured directly on dogs.
OFA (hip & elbow)
Bouvier Des Flandres: hip evaluations rated dysplastic (mild/moderate/severe combined), OFA cumulative statistics
- OFA is a voluntary-submission registry: owners/breeders choose whether to have a dog evaluated and whether to submit the result, so this is not a random sample of the breed and most likely understates true population prevalence.
Bouvier Des Flandres: elbow evaluations rated abnormal (grade 1-3 combined), OFA cumulative statistics
- OFA is a voluntary-submission registry: owners/breeders choose whether to have a dog evaluated and whether to submit the result, so this is not a random sample of the breed and most likely understates true population prevalence.
Other
Bouvier des Flandres: purpose class 'herding', from FCI group: Sheepdogs and cattledogs (except Swiss Cattledogs )
- Registry group membership at time of the source table, not an independent behavioural assessment.
Bouvier des Flandres (Working group): UK Kennel Club new registrations, 2025; -87.1% vs 2016
- UK-only; a breed with 0 or blank registrations in a year may be newly recognised, temporarily unregistered, or genuinely absent that year -- the source table does not distinguish these.